2011年大學(xué)英語四級范文寶典
導(dǎo)讀: 2011英語四六級進入備考階段，考試大整理2011年大學(xué)英語四級范文寶典備考資料供大家參考，祝大家取得好成績！
- 第3頁：英語四級范文：兒童教育應(yīng)群教還是因材施教
- 第4頁：英語四級范文：闡述健康在生命中的重要性
英語四級范文寶典：兒童教育應(yīng)群教還是因材施教
Some people think educate children of different abilities together will benefit them. others think intelligent children should be taught separately and give special courses， discuss both side and give own opinion!
[參考范文](兒童教育應(yīng)群教還是因材施教)
Endowed by different talents， every individual is contributing to our society in different ways. Therefore， to treat every student equally is a common practice at existent schools; however， there is a tendency of growing popularity that schools are oriented by producing "elite students". It has aroused fierce controversies， for which reason I suggest that schools should keep their traditional strategy unchanged.
To begin with， to separate students according to their individual competence can injure their personality development. Some seemingly intelligent students are instilled with a sense of superiority. Consequently， they place themselves over the rest of the class， but some findings have indicated that those are of great wise are not necessarily of great use.
Secondly， to categorize students with a rigid rule can spur the rivalry between students， which is harmful for the academic atmosphere of a school. Schools are prestigious because of their inborn ability to provide children a relaxing and cooperative environment to study. To treat gifted children different would inescapably upgrade the competition between children. Arguments or infightings thus escalate.
Admittedly， to devise particular courses for a certain group of students can find their way to benefit students’ future. Some students have advanced their special interests in some subjects， such as philosophy， astronomy， and geography， to mention but a few. Those subjects， in general， demand fewer practitioners， compared with other profitable subjects， e.g.， business， computer， and graphic design， etc. However， as emphasized before， it is rational to leave students options to choose， instead of forcing an inflexible rule
In brief， to train students for specific purpose might be beneficial in some sense， but to coach them together is more favorable a strategy.
Some people think educate children of different abilities together will benefit them. others think intelligent children should be taught separately and give special courses， discuss both side and give own opinion!
[參考范文](兒童教育應(yīng)群教還是因材施教)
Endowed by different talents， every individual is contributing to our society in different ways. Therefore， to treat every student equally is a common practice at existent schools; however， there is a tendency of growing popularity that schools are oriented by producing "elite students". It has aroused fierce controversies， for which reason I suggest that schools should keep their traditional strategy unchanged.
To begin with， to separate students according to their individual competence can injure their personality development. Some seemingly intelligent students are instilled with a sense of superiority. Consequently， they place themselves over the rest of the class， but some findings have indicated that those are of great wise are not necessarily of great use.
Secondly， to categorize students with a rigid rule can spur the rivalry between students， which is harmful for the academic atmosphere of a school. Schools are prestigious because of their inborn ability to provide children a relaxing and cooperative environment to study. To treat gifted children different would inescapably upgrade the competition between children. Arguments or infightings thus escalate.
Admittedly， to devise particular courses for a certain group of students can find their way to benefit students’ future. Some students have advanced their special interests in some subjects， such as philosophy， astronomy， and geography， to mention but a few. Those subjects， in general， demand fewer practitioners， compared with other profitable subjects， e.g.， business， computer， and graphic design， etc. However， as emphasized before， it is rational to leave students options to choose， instead of forcing an inflexible rule
In brief， to train students for specific purpose might be beneficial in some sense， but to coach them together is more favorable a strategy.
相關(guān)推薦：2011年英語四六級考試如何改寫范文
2011年6月英語四六級寫作常見問題答疑
相關(guān)推薦
課程免費試聽
| ?γ??????? | ??? | ???/???? | ??????? | ???? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ????????????????????????????????? | ????? | ??100 / ??100 |  |
???? |
| ???????????????????????? | ????? | ??100 / ??100 | |
???? |
| ???????????????????????? | ????? | ??100 / ??100 | |
???? |
| ??????????????????д???? | ????? | ??100 / ??100 | |
???? |
????0??????
????????????????